Thursday, November 14, 2013

Life after Death!

Directions: Your answer to these questions should be at least one paragraph long (6-7 sentences). When you reply to another student, you can reply to any student's answer to any one of these questions. You do not need to reply to another student's answer to all of these questions. Just reply to another student's answer to one question. Your reply to another student should be one paragraph (6-7 sentences) as well, and make sure your reply to another student includes some type of question about that student's post.

Post using the Anonymous Profile and be sure to type your Full Name in all posts. You will not receive credit for any posts without your Full Name.


Also, remember that if your posts are very long, you may need to break up your post into two or most posts. 

Last, remember to type your work first in a Word document before posting it and then copy and paste it to post it. If you have any trouble posting your answer to my questions or replying to another student, then print off your work and bring it as a hard copy to class the day it is due.

1. I asked you to read Chapter 9 of Reason and Religious Belief as background to our study of The Problem of Evil against God's Existence.  We went into detail on many of the ideas in this chapter.  However, on page 187 there is reference made to the good parent analogy that Rowe uses to argue against God's existence.  Using our book, explain the good parent analogy and how Rowe uses this to object to God's existence.  Last, after explaining Rowe's position, state whether you think that his argument is a good one.  Be sure to make your reasons for agreeing or disagreeing with him clear.

2. Start off by defining materialism.  One argument for materialism we discussed in class is the argument from Artificial Intelligence.  State this argument we covered in class.  After stating this argument, state whether you think it is a strong argument for materialism.  Be sure to make your reasons for agreeing or disagreeing with it clear.

3. One further argument for materialism that we covered in class was called The Brain Chemistry Argument.  State this argument we covered in class.  Moreover, as background for the topic of Life after Death, I asked you to read Chapter 11 of Reason and Religious Belief.  Pages 240-241 elaborate on the Brain Chemistry Argument further by talking about lots of examples of the tight connection between thinking, feeling, and desiring and what happens in the brain.  Using pages 240-241 of our text, discuss three specific examples, which we didn't discuss in class, of the tight connection between thinking, feeling, and desiring and what happens in the brain.  Last, offer up your assessment on the Brain Chemistry Argument for Materialism.  Do you think it is a good argument?  Why or why not?  Be sure to make your reasons for agreeing or disagreeing with it clear.

4. Start off by defining dualism.  Also, define the Identity of Indiscernibles.  One argument we studied for dualism involves the Identity of Indiscernibles.  Explain this argument.  Last, do you think it is a good argument?  Why or why not?  Be sure to make your reasons for agreeing or disagreeing with it clear.

5. As background for the topic of Life after Death, I asked you to read Chapter 11 of Reason and Religious Belief.  Pages 252-253 of this chapter talk about how some use near-death experiences to provide evidence for the possibility of life after death.  This is not a topic we will discuss much in class, but lots of people raise it in the context of life after death.  As such, it's good to think about at this point.  Using our book, explain how some use near-death experiences to argue for life after death.  Be sure to explain at least one of the "amazingly accurate" things people that have undergone near death experiences have discovered.  Last, offer your thoughts on whether near-experiences provide evidence of life after death.